A Face Full of Cake

Craig Skinner and Trinity Ward square off in an epic cake battle celebrating Skinner’s 500th career victory (Photo Credit UK Athletics/Kentucky Volleyball).

(LEXINGTON, Ky.) — Craig Skinner won his 500th volleyball match Saturday night, which apparently earned him the traditional reward reserved for legendary coaches everywhere.

A face full of cake.

Kentucky swept South Florida at Historic Memorial Coliseum, setting off a postgame celebration that included video tributes, family congratulations, and Trinity Ward being entrusted with the cake.

Bad idea.

“I was like, ‘Do I get to throw it in his face?’” Ward said.

She did.

Skinner retaliated, Ward claimed she was “tapping out,” and everyone eventually survived long enough to discuss a considerably more impressive accomplishment.

Five hundred wins.

“The 500 thing is not on my radar,” Skinner said.

Maybe it should be. Five hundred victories don’t happen accidentally, particularly at a place where Skinner wasn’t exactly inheriting a volleyball dynasty when he arrived 22 years ago.

He left Nebraska as a career assistant coach without really knowing whether he could successfully run his own program. He and his wife, Megan, came to Kentucky figuring he would see what he could build and perhaps move along after three to five years.

“They’re at the bottom,” Skinner recalled thinking. “Let’s see what we can do.”

So much for the five-year plan.

Skinner stayed, and somewhere along the way Kentucky volleyball went from trying to become relevant to becoming one of the programs everybody else recognizes.

The Wildcats now compete for SEC and national championships, draw large crowds to Historic Memorial Coliseum and receive invitations to the kinds of events that would have sounded preposterous when Skinner arrived. They’ll play UCLA on Wednesday and then face Penn State next weekend at Wrigley Field.

Those aren’t the opportunities Skinner inherited.

They’re the opportunities he helped create.

The interesting part, however, is listening to him explain how.

After Kentucky swept Utah State on Friday night, Skinner talked about the difficult week of practice that followed an earlier loss to Pittsburgh. He thought his team had gotten a little too comfortable.

“Comfort is the enemy of great,” he said.

So practice became decidedly less comfortable.

Skinner doesn’t necessarily believe the old coaching cliché that you play exactly like you practice. Players make mistakes. Execution isn’t always perfect. Some practices are ugly.

What matters to him is the effort behind them.

“I think you play to the effort you give,” he said.

A night later, after victory No. 500 and another sweep—this time over South Florida—Skinner offered an additional glimpse into a philosophy that has served him pretty well for more than two decades.

“Coaches are teachers,” he said. “As soon as coaches lose sight of that, that’s typically when they go off the rails.”

His players seem to understand that part of him better than anybody.

When asked what makes Skinner effective as a teacher, they didn’t talk about sophisticated volleyball strategy or championship-level motivational speeches. They talked about patience. They talked about his willingness to explain something differently when a player doesn’t understand it the first time. They talked about his consistency and how he shows up for them the same way every day regardless of what might be happening in his own life.

They also revealed that he makes a mean risotto and can apparently perform a backflip off a diving board.

I didn’t see either of those accomplishments listed in his official UK bio.

But the number 500 wasn’t what made Skinner emotional Saturday night. Watching the video tributes from former players did.

He remembered what those players were like when they first arrived in Lexington and, more importantly, the people they had become by the time they left.

“That motivates me more than wins,” he said.

Don’t misunderstand him. Skinner likes winning just fine.

“Wins are great, and championships are great, and we all are striving to do that,” he said. “Don’t let people kid you when they say they’re not.”

He’s simply learned that the best way to accumulate victories isn’t necessarily to obsess over accumulating victories.

Teach players. Develop them. Demand effort. Get an entire group of people, as Skinner put it, “looking down the same tracks at the same time.”

Do that long enough and apparently the wins start piling up.

Five hundred of them, to be exact.

Saturday night was supposed to celebrate everything Craig Skinner has accomplished during his 22 years at Kentucky. Instead, it may have provided a pretty good explanation for how he accomplished it.

And when somebody tells you to take off your glasses for a team picture while Trinity Ward is standing nearby holding a cake, don’t fall for it.

Dr. John Huang is a retired orthodontist, military veteran, and award-winning author. He currently serves as a columnist for Nolan Group Media and invites readers to follow him on social media @KYHuangs. His latest book is Whining for Posterity, available on Amazon.

Happy Birthday to Me!

I used to hate birthdays.

Mine, anyway.

Every August 25 felt less like a celebration and more like an annual notification that my shot clock was running out. Another year older. Another year closer to six feet under.

People would inevitably tell me, “It’s better than the alternative.” I hated that saying, too, mostly because they were right. Funny how getting older changes your perspective about getting older.

Today, I’m celebrating another birthday, and instead of lamenting the number, I’m trying to appreciate the fact that I get to have one. Because not everybody does.

I’ve been thinking about Tina Cox today.

Tina was a media colleague and one of those people who always seemed so alive. Vibrant is probably the best word. She had an energy about her that made it difficult to imagine a UK sporting event without her in it.

I remember distinctly that the last time I spoke with Tina, she asked me about Bingo.

She always asked me about my dog.

She could have asked about my writing, Kentucky basketball, my family, or any of the supposedly important things going on in my life. Instead, sooner or later, I’d get, “How’s Bingo?”

I loved that about her.

I’m not sure why that particular memory has stuck with me so strongly since she passed. Maybe because it was such a small thing, and I’m learning that small things aren’t always small.

Neither are birthdays. Tina doesn’t get another one. I do.

That realization will sober you up pretty quickly when you’re tempted to complain about getting old.

So I’m trying to savor today, and many of you have made that easy. I’ve heard from people I see all the time, people I haven’t seen in years, and people I’ve never met in person. I’ve gotten texts, calls, Facebook posts, and messages from people whose names brought back memories from completely different chapters of my life.

Some of you wrote a sentence. Some wrote several paragraphs. Some apparently decided a Facebook-generated “Happy Birthday!” was sufficient effort for another year.

I’ll take it.

Every single one meant something to me. Dan Mackey even bought me lunch. Thank you.

But here’s the strange thing about birthdays. You can hear from a hundred people and still notice the one person you didn’t hear from.

Kanisa didn’t wish me a happy birthday today.

There. I said it.

And it hurts more than I care to admit.

I’m not angry with her. I understand why things are the way they are, probably better than most people could. But I’ve also learned that understanding something intellectually doesn’t make it hurt any less emotionally.

I would trade a whole bunch of Facebook greetings for one “Happy birthday” from my wife.

Maybe that sounds ungrateful. It’s not. It’s just true.

So if there’s anything this birthday has taught me, it’s something I never would have considered years ago when birthdays were mostly about cake, presents and complaining about getting older:

Don’t ever take for granted hearing a “Happy birthday” from the person you love.

Don’t take for granted the card on the kitchen counter, the kiss in the morning, the dinner you didn’t particularly want to go to, or the lousy present they bought even though they should know you better by now.

And don’t dismiss those two simple words just because you’ve heard them every year for the last 30 or 40 years.

There may come a birthday when you’d give almost anything to hear them again.

I’m incredibly grateful for everyone who remembered me today. I’m saddened by the one person who didn’t.

But I’m also here.

Another August 25.

Another birthday I once might have dreaded.

This time, I’ll take it (along with any gift cards, free lunches, or book purchases).

Why Kentucky Didn’t Want Another Mitch Barnhart

The easiest way to understand Kentucky’s hiring of J Batt is to stop thinking about Mitch Barnhart. In fact, the farther away you get from Mitch Barnhart, the closer you get to understanding why Kentucky made this hire.

That’s not criticism. It’s reality.

For twenty-three years, Mitch Barnhart was exactly what Kentucky needed. He was steady, measured, patient, and dependable—all necessary traits for the head honcho in charge.

If Mitch Barnhart were a vehicle, he would have been a Toyota Camry. He wasn’t flashy. He wasn’t loud. He wasn’t constantly reminding you how innovative he was. He simply started every morning and got you where you needed to go.

For more than two decades, that was a tremendous asset. The problem, however, isn’t that Barnhart changed. The problem is that college athletics did.

The world Mitch Barnhart mastered no longer exists.

When Barnhart arrived in Lexington, players couldn’t transfer freely. NIL wasn’t a thing. Revenue sharing wasn’t a thing. Athletic departments weren’t competing against professional franchises for attention. Nobody was discussing private equity investments in college sports. Most fans had never heard the words “collective” or “portal.”

Back then, an athletics director hired coaches, built facilities, balanced budgets, and tried not to make national headlines. Today? Today an athletics director needs to be part CEO, part fundraiser, part lawyer, part economist, part politician, and part crisis manager. Somewhere along the way, college athletics stopped being a department and became an industry.

That’s why Kentucky’s hiring of J Batt feels so significant.

Kentucky wasn’t looking for the next Mitch Barnhart.

Kentucky was looking for Mitch Barnhart’s opposite.

Again, that’s not an insult. It’s a recognition that the job description has fundamentally changed.

Barnhart represented stability. Mitch Barnhart ran Kentucky athletics the way your favorite small-town banker used to run a bank. He knew people. He remembered names. He understood that relationships mattered. You got the sense he could walk through a student-athlete dining hall and recognize half the room.

J Batt inherits a world where the athletics director is less small-town banker and more hedge fund manager. The challenge isn’t remembering everyone’s name. The challenge is making sure the balance sheet survives long enough for there to be a team wearing the jersey.

Barnhart spent years carefully building Kentucky athletics.

J Batt arrives at a time when the entire structure of college sports seems to change on a monthly basis.

One man was built for certainty.

The other was hired for chaos.

And make no mistake—chaos is exactly what college athletics has become. Schools are paying players. Players are changing schools. Conferences are expanding. Conferences are disappearing. Lawsuits are flying. Revenue-sharing models are being rewritten. Television contracts are driving decisions that would have seemed absurd a decade ago.

The sport isn’t evolving. It’s mutating. Which is why I find Kentucky’s hire so fascinating. The university didn’t simply replace an athletics director. It acknowledged reality.

For years, Kentucky’s greatest advantages were tradition, facilities, fan support, and resources. Those things still matter. But they no longer guarantee anything. Today, success depends on navigating a constantly shifting landscape where the rules seem to change faster than the scoreboards.

The modern athletics director isn’t simply protecting an institution. He’s repositioning it. That’s a different skill set. It’s also a different personality.

Mitch Barnhart always felt like a caretaker.

J Batt feels more like a venture capitalist.

One was entrusted with preserving what Kentucky had built.

The other is being asked to figure out what Kentucky must become.

Those are very different assignments. And that’s why this hire feels bigger than many fans realize.

Most people will judge J Batt by wins and losses. That’s understandable. Fans should care about wins and losses. But his biggest challenge may have nothing to do with scoreboards. His challenge is ensuring Kentucky remains Kentucky while college athletics transforms into something none of us fully recognize.

That’s not easy. In some ways, it’s impossible. Because the truth is that the college sports many of us grew up loving are already gone.

The amateur model is gone.

The old recruiting model is gone.

The old roster-building model is gone.

The old business model is gone.

What’s replacing them remains a work in progress.

Which brings us back to J Batt. Kentucky didn’t hire him because Mitch Barnhart failed. Kentucky hired him because the world Mitch Barnhart mastered disappeared.

The next decade won’t be about protecting the past. It will be about surviving the future.

And that may be the most important hire Kentucky has made in years.

NIL, APR, and Other Fairy Tales

The University of Kentucky Athletic Department proudly announced this week that UK student-athletes achieved a combined 3.471 GPA this spring, marking the 28th straight semester above a 3.0.

Twenty-eight straight semesters. That’s a mark of unparalleled consistency.

The release was filled with impressive numbers. Four hundred fifty-nine athletes above a 3.0. One hundred thirty-six with perfect 4.0 GPAs. Volleyball leading the way with a staggering 3.865 GPA. Men’s basketball posting a sparkling 3.59. Football climbing above a 3.0. Eight teams earning perfect APR scores.

And honestly, those accomplishments deserve recognition. A lot of these athletes work incredibly hard balancing travel, practices, media obligations, workouts, NIL appearances, social media branding, and actual coursework. The academic support staffs deserve medals for somehow keeping all the trains running on time in an environment that increasingly resembles free agency with mascots.

Still, forgive me if I chuckled while reading the release.

Because while UK is celebrating APR scores and graduation rates, the rest of college athletics now operates like a bizarre hybrid of the NFL, Wall Street, and reality television. Revenue sharing has arrived with a vengeance. NIL collectives function like salary-cap departments. Boosters debate roster construction with the intensity of Fortune 500 executives discussing quarterly earnings. Coaches talk openly about roster retention costs while fans stalk transfer portal announcements like day traders watching stock tickers.

Yet every spring, universities still release these glowing academic reports with the warm sincerity of a church bulletin.

“At Kentucky, the educational mission remains central,” Mitch Barnhart said in the release.

And I actually believe he believes that. I do.

But the contrast is impossible to ignore.

One minute, fans are screaming online about the desperate need for a seven-foot rim protector who can defend ball screens and shoot 38 percent from three. The next minute, the university puts out an APR graphic like educational outcomes are all that matter.

That’s what makes modern college athletics such magnificent theater.

We’ve created a world where a freshman quarterback can earn more money before his sophomore year than several university professors combined, yet schools still expect us to become emotionally moved over cumulative GPA announcements.

Again, this isn’t anti-education. Quite the opposite. I still genuinely love universities. My family funds scholarships. I spent decades in healthcare and education-related environments. I’m one of the few media people who asks academically related questions and questions APR outcomes. I believe academics matter deeply.

Which is precisely why this whole charade fascinates me so much.

The NCAA still unveils APR scores every year with all the drama of sacred scripture being lowered from the mountaintop. The Academic Progress Rate remains one of those phrases that sounds incredibly important while simultaneously causing most fans’ eyes to glaze over instantly.

We all understand that the average fan is far more concerned about whether Kentucky has enough NIL money to keep a backup guard from transferring to Arkansas next Tuesday.

At this point, “student-athlete” feels less like a meaningful description and more like a nostalgic phrase from another era. Like “video rental store” or “collect call.”

I especially enjoyed seeing men’s basketball post a 3.59 GPA. A 3.59 at Kentucky, no less. That’s genuinely impressive considering half the fan base spent the offseason demanding more “dudes” and another year of eligibility for Otega Oweh.

The real heroes in all this may honestly be the academic counselors. Somewhere inside the Joe Craft Center, an exhausted advisor is probably trying to have a serious discussion about long-term educational development with a teenager whose NIL valuation already exceeds the salary of multiple associate professors combined. The fact those conversations happen with straight faces is one of the true miracles of modern college athletics.

And maybe that’s why these academic numbers feel so strange now. Not fake. Not meaningless. Just disconnected from what college sports has become.

A 3.471 GPA in the NIL and revenue-sharing era simply does not carry the same context it once did. Not with online coursework, massive institutional support systems, and billions of dollars floating around the enterprise. College athletics has evolved into a professional entertainment business carefully wrapped inside educational branding, and everybody involved knows it.

The schools know it.

The coaches know it.

The players know it.

The fans absolutely know it.

We just keep pretending otherwise because “student-athlete” sounds far more wholesome than “young entertainment employee with a Maserati and a meal plan.”

So yes, congratulations to UK Athletics. The accomplishments are real, and the work behind them deserves praise.

But every time I read one of these glowing academic press releases, I still can’t help but picture some wealthy booster proudly nodding at the 3.471 GPA announcement while simultaneously texting a collective representative:

“Wonderful. Now how much for that five-star offensive tackle?”

BLUEprint for Winning?

When I first saw Kentucky’s announcement about this new “BLUEprint” system, my initial reaction was the same as a lot of yours.

What is this BS?

Another buzzword. Another corporate-sounding initiative. Another step away from anything that once felt familiar.

But the more I sat with it, the more uncomfortable the realization became.

This isn’t BS. It’s reality. And maybe—whether I like it or not—it’s progress.

Because what Kentucky rolled out this week isn’t just some fancy database. BLUEprint is a centralized, analytics-driven platform designed to evaluate players across football, basketball, volleyball—every revenue sport—not just by how they perform, but by what they’re worth. It pulls together performance data, financial considerations, and roster projections into one system that helps decision-makers build teams with precision.

In plain terms, Kentucky has built itself a professional front office, the kind you’d expect in the National Football League, not on a college campus. And for the first time, Kentucky isn’t even trying to pretend otherwise.

And that’s where I really struggle.

Because I’ve spent a lot of time—probably too much time—writing about what Kentucky used to be. The tradition, the standard, the idea that this place meant something beyond wins and losses. That players came here not just because of opportunity, but because of identity.

But let’s be real—this pie-in-the-sky idealism didn’t die this week. It’s been fading for years. All BLUEprint does is put structure and a name to what has already replaced it.

And if the only thing that matters—if the bottom line—is winning, then I can’t sit here and tell you this is the wrong move. In fact, it might be the smartest thing Kentucky has done in years. Because the game has changed, and not adjusting isn’t noble—it’s negligent. You can’t compete in a marketplace driven by NIL dollars, transfer portal movement, and constant roster churn with gut instinct and nostalgia. You need structure. You need discipline. You need something that tells you not just who a player is, but what he’s actually worth to your program.

That’s what this is. It’s not about building a team anymore. It’s about managing a portfolio.

And frankly, that’s what Kentucky has been missing.

The last few seasons haven’t fallen short because of effort or pride. They’ve fallen short because the pieces didn’t fit—because the roster construction didn’t match the expectations, and because we were still operating like it was 2015 while everyone else had already moved on.

BLUEprint is an acknowledgment of that—a quiet admission that guessing isn’t good enough anymore.

But here’s the part I can’t shake—and I don’t think you should either.

There’s a cost to this. There always is.

Because once you start assigning value to players in a system like this, it inevitably changes how you see them. Not all at once, not in some dramatic, heartless way—but gradually, subtly. Development becomes projection. Loyalty becomes leverage. And that kid, like Dominique Hawkins or Derek Willis, who might have taken three years to grow into something special becomes harder to justify—and eventually, impossible to keep—when the numbers say someone else offers a better return right now.

That’s not evil.

It’s just efficient.

And efficiency doesn’t care about sentiment, pedigree, or passion—it just cares about return.

So when we talk about “Kentucky guys,” about culture, about the things that once separated the program with the greatest tradition in the history of college basketball from everyone else, we have to be honest about what we’re risking. Those things don’t disappear overnight—but they do get squeezed, marginalized, and replaced, piece by piece, by a system that rewards production over patience.

And maybe that’s what it takes now.

Maybe this is the price of competing at the highest level again.

I don’t like it. But I also don’t like watching Kentucky struggle to keep up in a world that has clearly moved on.

So here we are—not clinging to the past, not fully comfortable with the future, but standing somewhere in between, trying to convince ourselves this is still the same program we fell in love with—and cried over.

It’s not.

And maybe the most honest thing Kentucky did this week wasn’t launching BLUEprint. It was admitting—without actually saying it—that winning now requires becoming something different.

The question isn’t whether this works. It probably will. The real question is whether we’re willing to accept what Kentucky has to become for it to work.

Kentucky didn’t sell its soul. It just realized—too late—that it already had. And now, with BLUEprint, it’s trying to buy it back.

Not with tradition.

Not with loyalty.

But with numbers…and, hopefully, more wins.

Dr. John Huang is a retired orthodontist, military veteran, and award-winning author. Currently serving as a columnist for Nolan Group Media, he invites readers to follow him on social media @KYHuangs. Explore his latest, Whining For Posterity, and all his books at Amazon.

An Oak of Righteousness

“But the wisdom that comes from heaven is first of all pure; then peace-loving, considerate, submissive, full of mercy and good fruit, impartial and sincere.” – James 3:17

You can read Dr. Tom Cooper’s obituary if you want the facts. https://www.milwardfuneral.com/obituaries/Dr-Thomas-M-Cooper?obId=46963575

You’ll learn where he studied, what he accomplished, how many students he taught, how many lives he touched in the official, measurable ways that look good on paper and sound impressive when read aloud. All of it is true. All of it matters.

But none of it explains why his passing yesterday saddened me in ways that words simply can’t adequately express.

Dr. Cooper was one of my mentors. In dental school, yes. But also in Sunday School, which, as it turns out, may have been the more important classroom. In both settings, he did something meaningful: he paid attention to people. Not just the impressive ones, nor the loud ones, nor the future rising stars—but to every ordinary Joe like me who showed up wanting to learn.

In dental school, it’s easy to think teaching is about brilliance—how much you know, how fast you can correct someone, how efficiently you can expose ignorance. Dr. Cooper never taught that way. He had an unhurried confidence, the kind that didn’t need to prove anything. When he spoke, you leaned in—not because he demanded attention, but because you were curious about what he had to say.

He didn’t just teach dentistry. He taught students.

And then there was Sunday School—where he taught life.

Long before I ever stood in front of a class or a congregation, I watched him do something deceptively simple and profoundly wise. He didn’t teach the lesson he wanted to teach. He taught the lesson we were ready to hear.

One Sunday, probably sensing my early, unpolished enthusiasm for teaching, he gave me a piece of advice that has followed me through every single speaking engagement—whether radio broadcast, packed classroom, or that awkward circle of folding chairs when only two people showed up:

“Take the class where they want to take you.”

It sounds almost too gentle to be revolutionary. But it is.

What he meant was this: teaching isn’t about dragging people to where you think they should be. It’s about honoring where they already are. It’s about listening long enough to hear the questions beneath the questions. It’s about understanding that people don’t need your brilliance nearly as much as they need your presence.

That lesson shaped me more than any syllabus ever could.

It kept me from preaching at people when I should have been walking with them.
It kept me from filling silence when I should have been letting it speak.
It kept me from confusing authority with influence.

Dr. Cooper never chased the spotlight. He didn’t need it. His faith was sturdy, quiet, and deeply rooted. The Bible calls that an “oak of righteousness, a planting of the Lord for the display of His splendor.” That phrase fits him perfectly—not flashy, not brittle, not swayed by every new wind of opinion.

Just solid. You leaned on Dr. Cooper without realizing it. And only when he’s gone do you feel how much weight he was carrying for others.

I don’t remember every lesson he taught. I don’t remember every Scripture he unpacked or every clinical pearl he dropped in passing. But I remember how he made me feel: seen, capable, invited.

That’s the kind of teaching that lasts.

If there’s a classroom in heaven, I suspect he’s there already, smiling patiently, waiting for the rest of us to catch up. And if I’m lucky, when I finally walk in, he’ll give me that same gentle reminder one more time:

“Take the class where they want to take you.”

Because that’s where the real learning happens.

Discover his next scheduled teaching event here: Man Up – Men’s Ministry Retreat – St. Luke Church | Lexington, KY

This Ain’t No Philosophy Seminar

(LEXINGTON, Ky.) – When coaches are under fire, they usually don’t speak in riddles—they rant.

Jim Mora famously barked, “Playoffs?! Don’t talk about playoffs!”
Herm Edwards simplified the profession to its core: “You play to win the game.”
Mike Gundy, veins popping, yelled, “I’m a man! I’m 40!”

Those quotes didn’t require interpretation. They didn’t need a decoder ring. They landed because frustration stripped the message down to bone.

Which is why Mark Pope’s recent quote on his weekly coach’s show left so many Kentucky fans scratching their heads like they’d accidentally tuned into a philosophy podcast.

“What’s really important for us as coaches and as teammates is understanding the story that each of our guys and each member of our staff is telling themselves about what we’re going through right now…”

This is not a rant. It’s not normal coach-speak. It sounds more like a narrative symposium held in Ballroom A at the downtown Hyatt.

Before we dismiss it entirely—or turn it into a meme—let me explain why I might be uniquely qualified to translate what Pope was trying to say.

I spent decades as an orthodontist listening to people describe pain that wasn’t always where they thought it was. Patients told elaborate stories about one tooth when the real issue lived somewhere else entirely. My job wasn’t to validate the story. It was to identify the truth underneath it and fix the problem—whether the patient liked the diagnosis or not.

Coaching, at its best, works the same way.

So when Pope talks about “the story each guy is telling himself,” he’s really saying this:

Players are processing adversity differently. Some think it’s bad luck. Some think it’s their fault. Some think the system isn’t for them. Some think they should be playing more.

That part is reasonable, human, and accurate.

Then Pope says he wants to bring those stories back to two things: a point of truth and a point of common understanding.

Translation:
“We need everyone to stop lying to themselves—and agree on what we’re actually bad at.”

Still reasonable. Still logical. But strangely phrased for Kentucky basketball. It feels like Phil Jackson’s Zen without the structure—philosophy without the scoreboard support to justify it.

And that’s why it landed sideways.

Kentucky fans don’t need help understanding the story when the evidence is screaming:

• Slow starts
• Inconsistent effort
• Poor perimeter defense
• Questionable preparation

When you’ve had nearly two weeks to prepare and still fall behind by 21 points, the story doesn’t matter nearly as much as the symptoms. The frustration isn’t that Pope is wrong.

It’s that he’s explaining instead of commanding. At Kentucky, explanation often sounds like excuse—even when it’s not intended that way.

Fans are conditioned to expect blunt clarity in moments like this. Mora didn’t unpack emotional narratives. Edwards didn’t ask players how losing made them feel. Gundy didn’t workshop his truth.

They owned it.

That doesn’t mean Pope lacks intelligence or care. In fact, this quote suggests the opposite—he’s thoughtful, introspective, and trying to understand the human side of his team.

But this job isn’t graded on thoughtfulness. It’s graded on readiness—and ultimately wins and championships.

If every player is telling himself a different story, that’s not a literary problem. It’s a leadership one. Great programs don’t require narrative alignment sessions. They create roles so clear that internal monologues don’t matter.

At Kentucky, the story is supposed to be singular:

Defend.
Compete.
Earn minutes.
Win.

No subplots. No word-salad narratives from the coach. Kentucky basketball doesn’t need a narrator.

Pope’s quote might sound thoughtful in June. It sounds confusing in January.

And in January, Big Blue Nation is longing for something refreshingly old-school:

Less parable.
More accountability.

Let’s hope we get it.

This article was originally written for distribution through Nolan Group Media publications.

I’m on to Kenny Brooks

(LEXINGTON, Ky.) – I’m on to Kenny Brooks. Not in a stop-the-presses, breaking news kind of way. It’s more like the quiet realization that the man has cracked a code most coaches spend a lifetime chasing. If you want sustained success in basketball—real, transferable, program-defining success—get yourself a generational point guard, teach her, empower her, and then get out of the way just enough to let her become herself.

He did it with Georgia Amoore. And now, unmistakably, he’s doing it again with Tonie Morgan.

Morgan’s résumé is already starting to read like folklore. A buzzer-beater that stunned LSU last Thursday, followed by another surgical stat line—18 points, 14 assists—in a composed, methodical 74–52 dismantling of Missouri. Flashy when needed. Surgical when required. And always, always in control.

But the numbers only tell you what she’s doing. They rarely explain why—or how.

That’s where Brooks leaned back, grinned, and gave us the real scouting report—one that had nothing to do with crossover moves or assist totals.

“I don’t know what football team is doing good without a good quarterback,” Brooks quipped. “Tonie, she’s been phenomenal all year long… her willingness to be coached. She never makes a face when she doesn’t agree with something… she’s consistently just welcoming any kind of feedback and she takes it.”

There it is. The overlooked superpower.

Be Teachable.

In an era where athletes are branded before they’re built, where confidence sometimes masquerades as infallibility, Morgan’s greatest strength might be her posture in a film room. She watches. She listens. She absorbs. And then—this is the key—she applies.

Brooks made something else clear early, almost defensively, as if to protect Morgan from lazy comparisons: she is not trying to fill Georgia Amoore’s shoes. She’s building her own footprint. Different stride—with the same authority.

And authority she has.

Morgan can do it all. She scores at all three levels. She goes downhill with intention, not chaos. She distributes with either hand like she’s ambidextrous by design. She can take her defender one-on-one when the offense stalls. She understands shot selection. And she defends—not the Instagram kind of defense, but the grind-it-out, make-you-work-for-air variety.

Most importantly, Brooks has empowered Morgan to run the offense. Not just initiate it. Not just survive it. But to run it.

That kind of trust doesn’t come from a box score. It comes from habits—and a heck of a lot of communication and connection between coach and player.

Morgan explained it simply, the way players who truly understand their role often do.

“I have the ball a lot, so it is very important that I take care of it,” said the 5-foot-9 senior transfer from Georgia Tech. “So, when I do turn it over, I just move on. It happens… I just want to take care of it.”

That’s not coach-speak. That’s emotional maturity. Ownership without self-flagellation. Accountability without paralysis.

Teachable players don’t crumble when corrected or sulk when challenged. They don’t confuse coaching with criticism. They see feedback as fuel, not as insult.

And that—far more than a step-back jumper or a no-look dime—is what separates good point guards from the kind that quietly define eras.

Brooks knows it. He’s lived it. He’s building around it again.

Every great coach has a calling card. For Brooks, it might be this: he doesn’t just recruit talent; he intentionally seeks out posture and fit. The willingness to be molded. The humility to learn. The confidence to adapt.

Put a player like that at the point, and suddenly everything else aligns. Spacing makes sense. Tempo settles. Teammates breathe easier. Coaches sleep better.

Morgan’s story is still being written, but the early chapters are already instructive—not just for basketball, but for life. Be skilled, yes. Be confident, absolutely. But remain teachable through it all.

Because the players who last, the leaders who endure, and the programs that matter most are built not on ego—but on the desire to learn and get better.

And if Kenny Brooks keeps finding point guards like this?

Well… I’m really on to him now.

This article was originally written for distribution through Nolan Group Media publications.

The Scholarship Used to Be the Prize

(And Somewhere Along the Way, We Started Treating It Like a Coupon)

Let me get this out of the way early so nobody mistakes me for the guy yelling at clouds.

I know NIL is here to stay. I know players have always been paid. I know the system wasn’t pure, holy, or wrapped in a choir robe stitched by Sandy Bell in the UK Compliance office.

I’m not naïve. I’m just… disappointed. And there’s a difference.

Believe me, this isn’t about money. It’s about what money replaced.

Back in the day—cue the violin music, please—the scholarship was the prize. The scholarship was the golden ticket. It was the thing you earned, protected, and quietly understood could change the trajectory of your life.

Now? The sheepskin is an afterthought. A line item. Something you get thrown in after the collective wires the cash.

Wake up everyone! College sports didn’t just evolve. It inverted.

Players used to come to Kentucky for the name on the front of the jersey and hope—pray, even—that one day the name on the back might matter. Now the name on the back is everything, and the front is just a temporary billboard.

We’ve turned student-athletes into short-term mercenaries, and then we act surprised when loyalty evaporates faster than Vince Marrow’s blue wardrobe.

Again, I’m not anti-player. I’m anti-illusion. College sports has become all smoke and mirrors.

What bothers me isn’t that athletes are making money. It’s that we’ve somehow convinced them—and ourselves—that money is the point, not the fruit of hard-earned labor. We’ve normalized entitlement at warp speed. It no longer happens over multiple years of eligibilty. It’s now bestowed instantly.

A freshman hasn’t played a minute and already knows his “market value.” He doesn’t ask, How can I grow here? He asks, What’s my next leverage point? That’s not empowerment. That’s living one transaction at a time.

And the collateral damage of this lunacy? The college education—the very thing that was supposed to be the great equalizer—has been reduced to background noise.

Let me offer a confession from a man who looks suspiciously like a retired orthodontist with opinions.

My education made me rich. Not Warren Buffet-rich. Not even NIL-rich. But life-rich. It gave me a profession. It gave me options. It gave me the ability to fail and pivot and fail again without falling through the floorboards of society.

My college education wasn’t just about attending classes. It rewarded me with time—time to grow up, mess up, learn accountability, and figure out who I was when nobody was handing me a check. Let it be known that no booster ever Venmo’d me for showing up to Biology 101.

Now we’re telling kids—explicitly and implicitly—that education is optional, temporary, and secondary to their “brand.” That’s not progress. That’s negligent at best—and destructive at worst.

Here’s the part nobody wants to say out loud: If the scholarship no longer matters, the university no longer matters. And if the university no longer matters, then college sports becomes minor-league professional sports without contracts, guardrails, or accountability.

Which is exactly where we’re headed.

You can’t build culture on one-year leases.
You can’t preach loyalty while negotiating exits.
You can’t sell tradition to people shopping for the next upgrade.

And you certainly can’t pretend the system will hold when the foundation—education itself—has been hollowed out. When the value of the scholarship is cheapened, the value of the institution crumbles. When institutions crumble, so does the illusion that this was ever about anything more than money. And when the illusion dies, so does the sport we thought we loved.

I still watch. I still care. I still write. I still hope—perhaps foolishly—that the pendulum swings back toward balance instead of breaking loose entirely.

But make no mistake: this is doomsday not because athletes are getting paid—but because we’ve taught them that nothing else is worth valuing.

And when education becomes optional, everything downstream collapses. I don’t want to go backward. I want us to remember what was worth protecting as we move forward.

Happy New Year!
Now, please excuse me while I go ice my knee, check my blood pressure, and remind myself I’m not yelling at clouds.

I’m yelling at the future—because I still care about it.

This article was originally written for distribution through Nolan Group Media publications.
Dr. John Huang is a retired orthodontist, military veteran, and award-winning author. Currently serving as a columnist for Nolan Group Media, he invites readers to follow him on social media @KYHuangs. Explore his latest, Whining For Posterity, and all his books at Amazon.

huangswhinings

Tag: writing